Danielle Fugazy

Mrs. Fugazy is a contributing editor at Mergers & Acquisitions Journal. Prior to joining the publication, she served as the editor of Buyouts Magazine.

Related Items

Free Site Registration Free Site Registration

Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only Mergers Unleashed can deliver.

FREE site registration entitles you to:

Merger Mogul, Cross-Border M&A News, Private Equity Real Estate Alert and Post-Merger Integration News, our free email news alerts

Expert M&A and Private Equity Blogs

Industry White Papers

Buying Into the Bailout

By Danielle Fugazy, M&A Magazine

September 8, 2008

Even though September is not the start of the year, in some ways it is a time for new beginnings. Children go back to school, football season begins and the private equity community gets back to work after a few lazy weeks at the end of August.

This year, getting back to work seemed like it was going to be pretty dreary, that is until the US government announced it would take control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

I view this as good news for the deal-making crowd. The move should accomplish a couple of things, not the least of which being that it has quelled global investors’ fears about the pair going under. It should also help lower mortgage rates. But, most importantly, it could make banks feel more comfortable about writing new business. If it does, the private equity community would benefit tremendously, not to mention the overall US economy. This bailout could set private equity back on track to business as usual. (That is, more lenders willing to lend and a larger number of closed deals. I don’t think we will be going back to the days over leveraging.)

Alas, while the bailout is widely touted as a smart move by the government, critics believe it won’t make much of a difference over time and it will increase the US government’s debt, pushing US further into a recession. As a result, the private equity community would not see a pick-up in deal activity.

The funny thing for me is that I agree with the critics arguments; there’s no doubt the government will go deeper into debt, but I don’t understand what their point is. The GSEs were in a world of hurt, and other than bailing the two mortgage giants out what were the options? Arguing that Fannie and Freddie never should have been in their current position to be begin with may be accurate, but that ship has sailed, and if Freddie and Fannie had been allowed to go bust we would be worse off than we are. This certainly seems like a good alternative to what could have become a serious disaster.

Danielle Fugazy

danielle.fugazy@sourcemedia.com

Recent Posts

Don't Forget to Vote

I love how today everyone will tell you: 'Don't forget to vote.' As if you could. This has been the longest, not to mention most expensive, election ever. John Edwards was the first candidate to throw his hat in the ring and that was on December 26th, 2006. In other words, we have been living through this presidential election for almost two years.

A Lookback

As someone who covers the private equity industry and has several family members working at investment banking houses, I am constantly reading the mainstream news and looking back, trying to figure out exactly when everything went so wrong. Last week, I came across an article from The New York Times, dated Sept. 30, 1999. The article talks about easing credit to afford people the opportunity to buy houses. I found the piece very interesting given where we are today. I have excerpted a few passages below.

Index of Posts

Post a Comment

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Click here to register.

Reader Comments

Be the first to comment.