Adam Reinebach

Adam Reinebach is the Group Publisher of SourceMedia's Capital Markets division. Prior to joining SourceMedia, he was a vice president at Thomson Financial and the publisher of various Thomson publications, including Buyouts and Venture Capital Journal.

Mr. Reinebach earned his bachelor of arts at Rutgers University.

Free Site Registration Free Site Registration

Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only Mergers Unleashed can deliver.

FREE site registration entitles you to:

Merger Mogul, Cross-Border M&A News, Private Equity Real Estate Alert and Post-Merger Integration News, our free email news alerts

Expert M&A and Private Equity Blogs

Industry White Papers

News Flash: Banks & Sponsors Not Filing For Divorce

Yesterday I read an abstract in a competing publication that read as follows:

The twilight struggle between banks and buyout shops over financing commitments has produced tense moments and obscure legal quibbling. But so far at least, the parties are still talking.

Wow, the parties are still talking? Thanks for the revelation.

I know, everyone likes a good teaser, but this is pretty obvious stuff. While the power in the bank-sponsor relationship has clearly shifted back to the lender in the wake of the summer credit crunch, did anyone seriously think that banks would start ignoring or alienating the private equity community?

We’ve been saying for months in this column that while the world of financing has undeniably changed (i.e., the death of covenant-lite loans), deal flow is not going to dry up. There’s simply too much money to put to work, too many companies still for sale and—drum roll, please—too many reasons for lenders to stay active in the M&A market.

For one, lenders don’t earn fees unless they actually lend money, and M&A deals are typically more lucrative for banks than the average loan. What’s more, as the market shifts, many of the opportunities are actually safer and more lucrative now than they were a few months ago. So why jump ship now?

Last week some of my editors and I met with Chris Williams, Managing Director at Madison Capital Funding, a middle-market lender, and I jokingly asked him whether he thought the sky was falling. His face lit up as he proceeded to explain how his firm was busier than ever, had expanded its healthcare effort over the summer and was absolutely committed to working with financial sponsors on sound transactions.

Part of the reason for his optimism is that the recent credit hiccup has taken some of the opportunistic institutional lenders out of the equation. As such, financial sponsors don’t have as many financing options as they used to. If that means some of the crazy multiples and borderline irresponsible deal flow gets weeded out of the market, that’s not such a bad thing.

The other reason banks won’t abandon the private equity market is for the simple fact that, no pun intended, they don’t want to burn bridges. Over the past few years, buyout shops have been an important source of revenue for the lending community. And even if the stock market were to decline, well-capitalized sponsors—especially those comfortable with turnaround situations—will have plenty of banks to call on.

** We’ll be discussing how to survive in the post-froth M&A environment at The New Rules of M&A, a one-day event on Dec. 10 in New York. Click here for more information: http://www.sourcemediaconferences.com/NMA07/

Recent Posts

Reinebach: Know Your Market

When reaching out to or dealing with corporate dealmakers, a targeted message is paramount.

Corporate Dealmakers

If you're shopping a healthcare company and want to find a few private equity professionals or investment bankers who focus on this area, it won't take long to get started. Type in the right phrases on a search engine like Google, or search a news-rich site like www.mergersunleashed.com, and within seconds you're looking at relevant results.

Index of Posts

Post a Comment

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Click here to register.

Reader Comments

In a recent research project investigating Wealth Management one of our team members observed that a majority of Investment firms were either merging with banks or were attempting to develop a banking entity of their own. Jokingly we use a title for this as "Cashing Out of America", but the observation is that investment firms are about to lose control of Boomer's funds. Are these mergers merely a manuveur to keep the cash in control? [Kevin Dulle, January 23, 2008]