News Flash: Banks & Sponsors Not Filing For Divorce
September 25, 2007
Yesterday I read an abstract in a competing publication that read as follows:
The twilight struggle between banks and buyout shops over financing commitments has produced tense moments and obscure legal quibbling. But so far at least, the parties are still talking.
Wow, the parties are still talking? Thanks for the revelation.
I know, everyone likes a good teaser, but this is pretty obvious stuff. While the power in the bank-sponsor relationship has clearly shifted back to the lender in the wake of the summer credit crunch, did anyone seriously think that banks would start ignoring or alienating the private equity community?
Weve been saying for months in this column that while the world of financing has undeniably changed (i.e., the death of covenant-lite loans), deal flow is not going to dry up. Theres simply too much money to put to work, too many companies still for sale anddrum roll, pleasetoo many reasons for lenders to stay active in the M&A market.
For one, lenders dont earn fees unless they actually lend money, and M&A deals are typically more lucrative for banks than the average loan. Whats more, as the market shifts, many of the opportunities are actually safer and more lucrative now than they were a few months ago. So why jump ship now?
Last week some of my editors and I met with Chris Williams, Managing Director at Madison Capital Funding, a middle-market lender, and I jokingly asked him whether he thought the sky was falling. His face lit up as he proceeded to explain how his firm was busier than ever, had expanded its healthcare effort over the summer and was absolutely committed to working with financial sponsors on sound transactions.
Part of the reason for his optimism is that the recent credit hiccup has taken some of the opportunistic institutional lenders out of the equation. As such, financial sponsors dont have as many financing options as they used to. If that means some of the crazy multiples and borderline irresponsible deal flow gets weeded out of the market, thats not such a bad thing.
The other reason banks wont abandon the private equity market is for the simple fact that, no pun intended, they dont want to burn bridges. Over the past few years, buyout shops have been an important source of revenue for the lending community. And even if the stock market were to decline, well-capitalized sponsorsespecially those comfortable with turnaround situationswill have plenty of banks to call on.
** Well be discussing how to survive in the post-froth M&A environment at The New Rules of M&A, a one-day event on Dec. 10 in New York. Click here for more information: http://www.sourcemediaconferences.com/NMA07/

![Publishing Systems Powered by iProduction [nelson] SourceMedia](/media/ui/logo_sourcemedia.gif)
Post a Comment
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Click here to register.
Reader Comments
In a recent research project investigating Wealth Management one of our team members observed that a majority of Investment firms were either merging with banks or were attempting to develop a banking entity of their own. Jokingly we use a title for this as "Cashing Out of America", but the observation is that investment firms are about to lose control of Boomer's funds. Are these mergers merely a manuveur to keep the cash in control? [Kevin Dulle, January 23, 2008]